<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PC Gamer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timesink.ca/2010/01/06/pc-gamer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timesink.ca/2010/01/06/pc-gamer/</link>
	<description>Because the internet needs another gaming blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.timesink.ca/2010/01/06/pc-gamer/comment-page-1/#comment-10621</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesink.ca/?p=1050#comment-10621</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re still around, but I&#039;m in the same situation as you (and sad to hear they have a new Editor-in-Chief!). They thrive on getting exclusive interviews with companies like BioWare, who are still under the assumption that &quot;it ain&#039;t journalism unless it&#039;s in print&quot;. I really used to like PC Gamer and the old PC Gamer crew, they&#039;re a good bunch, but the magazine has certainly changed in the last few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re still around, but I&#8217;m in the same situation as you (and sad to hear they have a new Editor-in-Chief!). They thrive on getting exclusive interviews with companies like BioWare, who are still under the assumption that &#8220;it ain&#8217;t journalism unless it&#8217;s in print&#8221;. I really used to like PC Gamer and the old PC Gamer crew, they&#8217;re a good bunch, but the magazine has certainly changed in the last few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oakstout</title>
		<link>http://www.timesink.ca/2010/01/06/pc-gamer/comment-page-1/#comment-10620</link>
		<dc:creator>Oakstout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesink.ca/?p=1050#comment-10620</guid>
		<description>I picked up a recent issue at a local grocery store, so they are very much still in business.   I as well use to love PC Gamer and though over the years I have trusted them less and less to provide non advertising influenced game ratings, I use to find a lot of their previews and game developer articles interesting.  Not it looks more like a scrapbook crafted by bunch of blind Andy Warhol students.  But sadly, its the only mainstream magazine to still carry PC gaming information.  Although the current crop of editors have completely ruined the magazine with their patchwork articles and nonsense topics, I do still pick it up from time to time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I picked up a recent issue at a local grocery store, so they are very much still in business.   I as well use to love PC Gamer and though over the years I have trusted them less and less to provide non advertising influenced game ratings, I use to find a lot of their previews and game developer articles interesting.  Not it looks more like a scrapbook crafted by bunch of blind Andy Warhol students.  But sadly, its the only mainstream magazine to still carry PC gaming information.  Although the current crop of editors have completely ruined the magazine with their patchwork articles and nonsense topics, I do still pick it up from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
